China Book Reviews

 

John Lee, Will China Fail? The Centre for Independent Studies, Sydney, 2007.

ISBN 9781864321807 (pbk)





A pessimist of Enlightenment: John Lee's Will China Fail?

by Jason Lee

A good number of interesting books have recently been written and published about today's China, though they tend to fall into one of two categories: either they are hyper-critical, often predicting China's imminent collapse, or they are overly celebratory and optimistic. Of the latter, the more sophisticated and empirically-based ground their arguments in a rejection of the European Enlightenment, or at the very least, call for a less dogmatic approach to understanding and evaluating human rights and "alternative" systems of governance. Such studies include Daniel Bell's Beyond Liberal Democracy: political thinking for an East Asian context (2006), Doug Guthrie's China and Globalization (2006) and Randall Peerenboom's China Modernizes (2007). Of the former variety, we have books like Gordon Chang's The Coming Collapse of China (2001), Minxin Pei's China's Trapped Transition: the Limits of Developmental Autocracy (2006) and  Will Hutton's The Writing on the Wall: China in the 21st Century (2007) - which evaluates the importance of Enlightenment institutions via a reading of Habermas.

John Lee's book belongs, as the title indicates, to the list of China doom books. Lee, an Australian of Chinese heritage with a PhD in international relations, holds the view that China is "barely managing to stay half a step ahead of disaster despite its impressive growth figures." Far from being a successful dictatorship, China, argues Lee, will one day soon fall as a result of its failure to embrace the Enlightenment values of democracy, a free press and the rule of law.

According to Lee, "China's rulers are explicit in that they do not intend a transition that will ultimately reduce their power, role and reach. The regime's 'opening up' of China and engagement with the world is being done to entrench and salvage its own exclusive rule." (p.154) This presents the West with a moral challenge, argues Lee, because China's rulers seek to replace the United States as the world's next superpower "armed with a moral and political reasoning that is at odds with the freedom and restraints on governments in the West." (p.154)

"The world wants China to succeed for economic, political and humanitarian reasons." says Lee. "The alternative would condemn over a billion Chinese to a grim existence. That China's current model is failing, not succeeding, makes the moral and strategic challenge more profound, not less." (p.154)

So Lee's heart seems to be in the right place, but how correct is he in his assessments? Is China really failing, as he so strongly believes? Lee understands that China's rise presents the West with an ideological challenge, one that, if China were to succeed in rising to the status of supreme global superpower, would pull the rug out from under the feet of those countries that champion capitalist democracy as having universal appeal. "The Chinese model is not simply an economic model but a model of political-economy," he very correctly observes. (p.33) While China's growth over the past 25 years has been truly spectacular, Lee argues that focusing on the politics behind China's model offers a fundamentally better understanding of what is occurring in China than do pure economic analyses. (pp.33-34) It is only when we examine China's political-economy, argues Lee, that we can begin to see the cracks, for what the CCP fears the most from its market reforms, "is the emergence of new elites within their own society that might challenge their political authority." (p.42) In order to remain in power, they must placate potential new losers from the new economy, while co-opting the emerging winners: a juggling act that is easier said than done, especially in the absence of a free press and the rule of law.

Free markets "need independent courts to enforce rules and regulations, and to uphold contracts and payments," notes Lee, but in China, "granting and enforcing widespread property rights would strip away the power of CCP officials who essentially rule through the extraction of collective rents and poorly compensated seizures." (p.49) Apologists for the Chinese system may very well like to point to the frequent anti-corruption drives initiated by the Central Government as evidence that such corruption is being tackled, but Lee is quick to dismiss such drives as insincere, for they are focused mainly on catching out corrupt individuals: "While the attention is firmly on the prosecution of high profile individuals on the take, there is certainly something questionable about the sincerity of campaigning to eliminate China's 'rampant' corruption (in the words of President Hu) when relationships inimical to the effective operation of free markets between political and economic arms are relied upon (or at least encouraged) by the one-party regime to maintain their system of patronage and reward that which is essential to remain in power." (p.51) The evidence for this? Citing Carsten Holz of the Far Eastern Economic Review, Lee notes that "of the senior positions in the five industrial sectors - finance, foreign trade, land development, large-scale engineering and securities - 85-90% are held by children of high-level Party officials." (p.51)

One of the many interesting insights offered by Lee is his observation that the problem for the CCP today is that the rhetoric of revolution is no longer engaging. China has become less of a totalitarian state (where it was deeply involved in very aspect of life), and more of an authoritarian one. "Opening up the economy has decreased the relevance of the CCP for millions of Chinese and increased the resentment of many others; in particular rural areas where reforms have been the most dramatic." (p.85) According to one survey cited by Lee, carried out in Xinjiang Province, 65% of the respondents identified the tax burden as being the principal cause of social instability. (p.86) back in 1999, taxes in Hubei Province were so high that in one jurisdiction, farming was unprofitable for 80% of the farmers. (p.86) Very often, these taxes are not spent on improving government services like to local infrastructure, public health or education, but are instead used to enrich local Party members. Taxes are often therefore considered by farmers to be illigitimate, and are often met with open revolt.

Lee goes on to discuss the various problems with China's banking system, its aging population, its growing unemployment problem, its fiscal problems, concluding that:

"China is a country in a profound mess. It's economics and wealth creation are inefficient and flawed, its financial structure is unsound, and the misallocation of resources is massive, chronic and deep-rooted. Its growth is artificially fuelled and unsustainable, and the wealth created is systematically wasted and directed towards less and less productive areas. Government and social deficits are mounting while the regime - which is itself largely the cause of them - cannot offer any viable solutions without precipitating its own demise. It therefore maintains a holding strategy while these problems worsen. Meanwhile, the lot of the majority of the population is either stagnant or in decline, while economic elites (who are the regime's newest support base) continue to thrive but only as a result of the tenuous and ultimately unsustainable growth strategy. Most significant decisions made by the regime are therefore tactical ones - putting out spot fires - driven by the logic of pure political survival rather than the logic of fundamental and sustained transformation. Meanwhile, the fragmented regime hangs on the best it can and eliminates or impedes any threats they can see to their political dominance." (p.112)

While this is a well structured and clearly argued book, full of interesting insights and criticisms, it does have its flaws. Lee's selective use of evidence, along with his failure to consider alternative readings, to some extent at least, undermine many of his central arguments. He presents a very one-sided picture, though intelligently enough argued to make it a good companion volume to China's Trapped Transition, by Minxin Pei, and to Will Hutton's The Writing on the Wall.


small fry
6/27/2008 02:44:35 pm

Just read your review Mr Lee, and so I’m here to tell you that here in the UK, Will Hutton is widely regarded as a true champ! Yet in your review you suggest that he is too one-sided, not unlike John Lee. whose very fine book you give only 3 stars to. Either you believe in the universiality of Enlightenment values and institutions, or you don’t. One really shouldn’t sit on the fence. To stand by and watch others suffer the indignity of human rights violations is fundamentally immoral and cowardly. I applaud writers like Hutton and Lee - two writers who are brave enough to speak out by taking sides - the side of democracy, rule of law, and universal human rights.

Reply
7/31/2008 02:56:02 am

There is no single "China" case where everyone is obliged to leap on a bandwagon. To sit on the fence has its season, and taking sides has its season. If "enlightenment" means supporting everything directed against the CCP, I prefer to sit on the fence. Enlightenment is an obligation to judge cases one by one.

Reply
Simon Louie
5/13/2009 02:46:12 pm

This slim volume by Dr John Lee presents a truthful indication of the actual situation behind China's gleaming facade of growth and modernity. His book deserves the highest praise, as it details the unsound underlying fundamentals of China's "economic miracle." China's growth is presented as nothing miraculous, in fact it's rather slow considerning how low their base was. The Communist Party of China's days are numbered. This book shows why.

Reply
Lily
6/7/2009 06:12:24 pm

@Simon Louie,

We will wait and see.

The Soviet Union fell not because it did not embrace what you people call "enlightenment". It fell BECAUSE it was trying to be more democratic and embracing of the western ways. This resulted in political turmoil, revolts, and the list goes on.

China will not repeat this msitake.

An enlightment is called an enlightment becasue few could achieve it. An "enlightenment" that is so universally accepted as the dogma of the west is ignorant and cheap.

That lipstick that looks good on you does not mean that it will look good on me.

Reply
David
8/23/2009 02:35:11 pm

This book is like another copy of "The Coming Collapse of China" by Gordon G.Chang, only that it lacks of new perspectives.

The rooted problem of Westerners (both Americans and Europeans) being lack behind in the current Global Development race is we dare not to face the truth. The truth is... People in Aisa, like Chinese, Vietnamese, even Malaysian and Singaporean, are not really fan of our so-called "full democracy" or "universal human right". Why? Because they are currently doing better than us under their own type of systems. The actual living standard improvement is much faster at their side than at our side. Why should they listen to us?

Books like "Will China Fail?" and "The Coming Collapse of China" are doing nothing good except blinding us from seeing the actual truth. What will happen to China if we believe John Lee that China will fail? Nothing! Except that China will grow even stronger, and we will miss the opportunity of catching up with her. This was exactly what had happen after Gordon G.Chang published his book "The Coming Collapse of China" in 2002. China didn't collapse like Mr. Chang had expected, instead it becomes the only major economy maintaining positive growth in the current financial crises.

We should stop wasting our money and time on people like Gordon G.Chang and John Lee. Thay are not any smarter than you and me.

Reply

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.